The neatly arranged and labeled keys are available for employees, customers and Family use at any time. It's not just a matter of counting them up.*With this wall-mounted device, you can put your keys wherever you need them, no need to look for misplaced keys, because you can find them immediately when you need them. Saturdaynightz ( talk) 19:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC) Many of the third-party sources that were included are not ones we would consider reliable sources, or cover the topic so slightly that it's not considered a strong indicator of notability. I'm a little confused as to what concerns are there. Onel 5969 TT me 15:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC) Onel5969:, are you saying that there were too many non-third party sources compared to third-party sources listed on the page? Should there be less non-third party sources, or should there be more third-party sources? I figured at least nine third-party sources was better than just one or two listed on previous versions of the page from years past. However, I felt that the additional independent sourcing still didn't address the prior concerns. Nat Gertler ( talk) 14:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC) NatGertler, I completely agree with your assessment. I think that deserves recognition and consideration. While most of the references are non-third party and thus useless for notability, and some are questionable sources, this 2018 article from Kotaku shows that it was getting attention years after our previous consideration in a source that has carried some inside-the-gaming-world weight. I will say that the new version is at least part way toward addressing the problems cited at AfD. Saturdaynightz ( talk) 15:50, 28 February 2021 (UTC) Notability at least approached [ edit Onel5969: I understand the reversion of the new version that Saturdaynightz: had put into the place (jumping the gun a bit, but hey, we've all been enthusiastic). Improvements made to my initial draft for Toontown Rewritten that I've worked on within my sandbox can now be found at Draft:Toontown Rewritten. Thoughts? ( Draft:Toontown Rewritten) Saturdaynightz ( talk) 15:50, 28 February 2021 (UTC) Februdraft review (Of course, if you think there are things there which are worth saving, you may, but it doesn't seem to be sourced.) - Nat Gertler ( talk) 14:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC) It has been done.
#TOONTOWN REWRITTEN WIKIA FREE#
Saturdaynightz ( talk) 05:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC) Given that the draft which is there was done as basically the sole edit of an editor who did it nine months ago and has not returned, you should feel free to wipe out that draft and replace it entirely. Nat Gertler ( talk) 04:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC) Where on the page should I include the draft so it can be easily seen? That page currently already has a draft. There was consensus to replace the page with a redirect, you're going to need to find some consensus to undo that. If you can find such sources, I suggest that you create a draft article at Draft:Toontown Rewritten and get that up to snuff in terms of sourcing, then recommend here that people review it. The references used were mostly to the game's site, and none to the sort of reliable, third-party sources we seek to demonstrate notability. Saturdaynightz ( talk) 05:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC) The article as it was put up did not address notability concerns at all. A new proposal should take place discussing the page because the last proposal was made in 2014 with arguments that can now be refuted.
The staff at Toontown Rewritten have done a lot of marketing for the game as well so there's absolutely no way it hasn't gained enough coverage, especially since they have social media outlets too. As much as I'd like to link them, copy and pasting is a pain in the neck on Wikipedia. Simple Google searching can be done to find those articles. Not only have there been several articles about the game, searching up "Toontown" via Google prompts Toontown Rewritten to appear first.
Toontown Rewritten is almost an decade old game. My question is why? One of the past arguments is that Toontown Rewritten did not gain enough coverage but I disagree. Plenty of citations, and proper editing and formatting were put in place to warrant Toontown Rewritten as a sufficient standalone page, yet it was revoked back to its redirect. I recreated the Toontown Rewritten page completely from scratch. Nat Gertler ( talk) 00:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC) Februrestoration Until there are significant new sources to be found, it should remain a redirect. However, as the restoration added no new sources, there was nothing there that conquered the reasons for which it was previously turned into a redirect, which was done as a result of the redirect discussion listed above. An editor just tried to restore and expand this article.